"Another delay at Cigar Lake is not good news and is testing our faith in management's ability to provide an accurate assessment of when the mine will achieve production," said Greg Barnes, an analyst at TD Newcrest Inc. in Toronto, in a note to clients.
But Krahn says Cameco executives are confident in setting the 2011 date.
"We provide the best information that we can that's available at the time. Certainly, in terms of good disclosure and good communication, we'll provide updates as they become available," he said in an interview.
Sealing the source of the flooding and pumping the water out of the mine will take more months than anticipated, and the possibility of excavating a second shaft contributes to the new production date being set.
"Completion of the second shaft will provide both an alternative route out of the mine in case of an emergency and additional ventilation," said Krahn.
The cost of the mine's development has increased with the delays. Originally pegged at $450 million in December 2004, construction costs are now expected to be about $1 billion.
The delay in production has, in the past, put pressure on the spot-market price of uranium. Since the October flood, the price has more than doubled to as much as $138 a pound because of concerns that the supply of uranium may be insufficient in the short-term to satisfy a growing demand. On Thursday, Cameco shares trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange fell 68 cents to close at $52.15, a 1.29 per cent change. The stock has risen 13 per cent in the past year. Krahn isn't concerned about the slight drop in the share price. "Our objective as a company is to ensure that (in the) long-term that we have a strong and financially healthy company that meets all our measures of success. And when we do that, I think the share price will take care of itself," he said.Cameco's next update on Cigar Lake will be included in the company's second-quarter report to be issued July 30. The project is a joint venture, with Cameco owning 50 per cent.
lhaight@sp.canwest.com
